Year: 2013 Genre: Action, Crime, Thriller Director: Jee-woon Kim Starring: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Forest Whitaker, Johnny Knoxville
Description: The leader of the drug cartel busts out of the court and speeds Mexico border, where the only one in his way is the sheriff and his inexperienced staff. Review: I grew up watching Arnold, I have all his movies, I'm what you call a serious fan Schwarzenegger. I've been waiting a decade to get back to the movie, and I was not disappointed. The Last Stand is not perfect, but fans of Arnold can be happy because he really is back! The premise (for those who havent watch dozens of times as I trailer) is a Mexican cartel boss (Eduardo Noriega) has escaped from prison to be transported and taken to Mexico border, and it will arrive there through the quiet town of Sommerton, Arizona. Sheriff Arnold quiet town, and he is the last hope FBIS end the vicious gang. This movie is full of intense action, blood, exciting car chase (by a supped up Corvette ZR1, with over a thousand horsepower) and funny one-liner. The film does not take itself too seriously (which is good) and surprisingly funny throughout. Arnold acting is a little rusty, but more on that in action scenes. And the action scenes (many) are interesting and bloody, the theater continued to applaud. The pace is perfectly cast flew by.The movie is amazing ... Luis Guzman is hilarious as vice Arnold, Forest Whitaker as the lead FBI agent, Peter Stormare as a man's hand right crazy crazy villain, Johnny Knoxville is a city clown, Harry Dean Stanton as eccentric old farmer, the list goes on ... The film is everything I want from a movie of Arnold, its fun (!), Action-packed and very fast (laughs) a class liner. Fans can not Arnold will not have much to it, but this movie was made for fans of Arnold and provided.
Year: 2012 Genre: Crime, Drama, Thriller Director: Oliver Stone Starring: Blake Lively, Taylor Kitsch, Aaron Taylor-Johnson
Description: Pot growers Ben and Chon face off against the Mexican drug cartel who kidnapped their shared girlfriend. Review: It was not a great movie. This could be a great movie, but he was disappointed in two main ways. Firstly, two of the three main characters terrible. Blake Lively is the perfect eye candy, but it's just not a good actress. Shes not bad in small supporting roles (in the city), but simply can not carry the lead. Unfortunately entire movie revolves around her (and she said), so that gaps are front and center. Whenever the voice-over came, I cringed. It was really not a good choice. Taylor Kitsch is not better. Again ... good pleasure, bad actor. Very poor performance. It is not only soul, and adds nothing to his character whatsoever. You must be crazy Fast & Furious movie playing opposite Vin Diesel, not Oliver Stone drama. Another important drawback of this film is even more serious, and that the structure of the story. We are never given the opportunity to understand why the three main characters (Chon, Ben and Ophelia) have strong feelings for each other. They are told they are, but do not get any real reason to believe it. This is very important because the premise of the film is literally hanging on their relationship. If you are going to build a dramatic story about an unconventional triangular relationship, it is best to explain in more rapid stage exactly how this relationship happened if the public usually knows why we should worry characters. Especially when players are portraying these characters arent very good to begin with. I know I always wonder why these two have a daughter how to have absolutely no jealousy, why not once thought about double crossing each other and why one of them care so deeply for it - the point that they are willing to risk their lives and commit terrible crimes, in order to save. Where did all the love and loyalty come from? It has never been adequately explained, and the whole film suffers from a very it.On slightly positive, the veteran players have done a good job. Benicio Del Toro was wonderful, psychotic cartel underboss, John Travolta chews the scenery pieces, and Salma Hayek was completely convincing in his role. Unfortunately, their powers only underscore the inability of young water. Its said that this was the best scene of the entire film between Del Toro and Travolta, with none of the three main actors found, and alludes to the promise of this lost film. Many opposed the violence depicted in the film critics, but I had no problem with it. You really can not make a film about the Mexican drug cartels without violence, so I do not feel that it is unfounded. Unfortunately, it's not that the film is all the more plausible of the perspective.Overall field, I just think it is a very good movie. I do not think Peter felt perfectly comfortable with what he was doing here, trying at times, but that Tarantino is not unhappy. And I think that if this movie was in the hands of Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez, probably would not get much better even, perhaps many.
Year: 1995 Genre: Action, Crime, Drama Director: Michael Mann Starring: Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Val Kilmer
Description: Group robbers experts are beginning to feel the heat from the police, though unknowingly leave a mark on their last heist. Review: It seems like a strong statement? Devotees of classic cops and robbers flicks of the past must take exception, but I think that Michael Mann achieved some measure of perfection by means of heat. Breaking this gem of a film at three under its core, this is a film about men - strong men - and the role that the women of the film plays on them, for better or worse. Take a good soldier Pacino as Vincent Hanna, one of the most intense characterizations of tragic hero that I have ever seen, as he laments the loss of his third marriage for pill-junkie wife. The fact that he had discussed with his archnemesis (De Niro) in what historians regard as one of the most frantic one in the history of film. dialogue in this area (the end of the first film, if you own version VHS) constitute the last half of the film beautifully, as our two opponents come to a joint statement that they had no hand in choosing the path that lead their struggle to the end, their nature very as defining their respective works that any attempt to do otherwise would just be a waste of time. When I hear some (which I am ashamed sometimes called close friends) say that shooting warm in places, I admit that there are times when the film which requires more attention quickly that they offer a film they happen to be looking at any given time (Im sorry not every director is Jerry Bruckheimer) is moving in the warm character development that most would not accidentally hurt. I think the interaction between ex-con who is attached to employment in the restaurant and opportunistic scum of the head and his grandmother is so proud of him to swallow his pride to not only provide a good pummeling sonofabitch. But there is catharsis that I felt for the former con when De Niros its properties and provides an opportunity to take just one more score, for the old. Who does not feel for this guy - this little character in the movie big time heavyweights who gets to shine for a brief few moments. Thats why Heat is true: a series of short, some touching, some trauma, and others still incredibly scary in the sense that it is inspired by the romantic, which, as I see it is not black or white picture of the protagonist and villain, but meeting of gray that are combined to create a clear scope of practice of the film could not be found in hundreds of films together. One of the five favorite films of all time, heat is the feast of the picture theaters edge and pulse-pounding action. Come hungry.
Year: 2001 Genre: Comedy Director: Keenen Ivory Wayans Starring: Anthony Acker, Mark Barrett, Anna Faris
Description: Four teenagers were deceived by his visit to a haunted house for a project escolar.Cuatro teenagers were deceived by his visit to a haunted house for a school project. Review: OK, not Oscar material, and is quite poorly done. But again, like most dumb comedies, I walked to the theater in a good mood and laughing, and look forward to Scary Movie 2 I mean, people are so hard on this film, I know, I know, that it is not the greatest movie or a comedy. But if you arent waiting for a lot of fun and laughter, I think in general just seems to ring then.We movies are old actors than the original Scary Movie Anna Farris again surprising Regina Hall, Marlon and Shawn Wayne. Scary Movie takes movies such as The Exorcist (a hilarious scene by the way), Poltergeist, The Haunting, Mission Impossible, Charlies Angels and What Lies Beneath. Some great add ons such as Tim Curry, I'm just having fun. Tori Spelling, yeah, she's a little scary, but for some reason he's still got the same part of his laughs.The Butler just killed me by the hand. Yes, it's gross, but I think you just have to let go and just go for a joke. Scary Movie 2 is not the best comedy ever, but a decent one brain off. Sick joke, yes, and very rude, this movie is not for everyone. But I think that if you enjoyed the first Scary Movie, you will enjoy this one! 7/10
Description: As the asteroid approaches Earth, a man finds himself alone after his wife leaves in a panic. He decides to go to unite with his high school sweetheart. Accompanying him is a neighbor who accidentally put the key in his plan. Review: Everyone knows calm before the storm occurring. Looking Friend In the End of the World, what's amazing is how calm lasts.Throughout first part of this movie, you can not help but wonder, how Watch how to react if you heard indifferent to reports of radio and television for over 70-mile wide asteroid traveling the world and destroy life as we know it. Do you want to seek refuge rain shelter and hope for the best, or say the hell with it! and do all you couldnt when there was established in order purpose? Dodge (Steve Carell) seems to find third option for someone else to even try to consider: sitting peacefully and maintain their own class than almost everything else is involved in an orgy or riot. At the same time calm works for him instinct of survival, it reflects her loneliness. More people around him, is lonelier seems.Very similar to Bill Murrays character lost in translation, leading Carell is so good, even in to it. This is all the more fascinating when hes only character in the film who does not throw caution in the wind. After all, would you be this calm if the world will end? Keira Knightley is Penny, British lively but distraught woman, who lives in the same building as Dodge. It looks like one night outside her window, and was frantically crying after realizing that he cant fly back home to Britain to see his family. Knightley is in stark contrast to Carell in many ways, and it's welcome presence in the film. And I'm glad the film did not try to cover her cute accent.The British film develops a kind of road-trip movie when riot ensues outside the apartment building, and convinces Penny to drive Somerset Dodge, Delaware, as his n knows someone who owns an airplane. As it turns out, the Dodge was also a high school girlfriend, who wrote him a few months earlier, before his wife left him.Sounds the trip familiar from another movie? Also, look for a friend of the End of the World will take one direction, you think you're going, and then often make a sharp left when you least expect it. The film is also more fun than the title suggests, there are some startling moments I've seen the future and do not expect, and you keep seeing how many reasons.Is is a love story between Dodge and Penny? As of last salmon fishing in the Yemen (2012), you will find yourself unsure whether the two characters will fall in love with, or if there are at least a little traction, or if it really makes any other difference.There wonder after watching this movie. Notably, it is the world really going to end? Everything in this film seems to think so. While it is fascinating to see how different characters react to the news, you see, because you want to see if it really does. It cant be a dream or illusion, can it? Its great that summer action flicks, disaster movies, there is one movie that takes its time to show how ordinary people react to extraordinary things. There is an asteroid headed towards Earth, but no explosions, deaths, astronauts, superheroes, or even (surprisingly), the camera shots of the sky in this movie at all. Moviegoers who hated Armageddon (1998) is released, Im sure.Besides Carell and Knightley, the other actors seem fair known as short cameos appearances may in reality. However, each of the performance of all those involved will stay with you to the point where you will probably find one character and say, Yeah, the ID is likely to be that guy in the circumstances. As the doomsday clock counting down, and the film ends, you may find yourself reevaluating what you want is the last picture in your mind before it was all over.
Year: 1994 Genre: Animation, Adventure, Drama Director: Roger Allers Starring: Matthew Broderick, James Earl Jones, Jeremy Irons
Description: Wrong thinking he killed his father, escaping guilt ridden lion cub into exile and abandons his identity, the future king. Review: The Lion King is a great movie. Along with a great story (inspired by William Shakespeare's Hamlet), great animation, and an all-star cast of voices, That is the lesson learned from this movie (although it is a little rough for the kids). As honor.I responsibility and rank this animated film of the great films I've ever seen. It was part of my childhood and it is a film experience I will never forget. And hopefully, you will not be able to. A + +
Year: 2013 Genre: Animation, Adventure, Comedy Director: Kirk De Micco Starring: Nicolas Cage, Emma Stone, Ryan Reynolds
Description: After the destruction of the cave, caveman boy with the help of family migration genius with the unknown world of the fantastic. Review: I saw this film at the instigation afternoon. It was a very enjoyable film for the whole family. My husband and I sat there and laughed often to completely fascinated by the story and graphics. Meanwhile, my daughter and my 7-year-old grandson sitting with us, and laughed almost the entire movie. It's something for people of all ages to enjoy. It was warm, and sometimes completely withdrew their deepest feelings, too. The characters are engaging, and the guy you find yourself cheering as time goes by, and animals that interact with people, often stole the show! I know that some critics have problems with some of the fantastic creatures that are visible and can get along with exceptional Croods things that are physically unable to work. I knew that I went to this film, this film is fiction, though, so I was able to stop my expectations to reality, and go on a ride that I wanted DreamWorks seen. I totally enjoyed, so this film for what it was - funny comedy about a family going through changes, and how to deal with these changes. I would definitely recommend seeing a great movie!
Year: 2012 Genre: Adventure, Mystery, Sci-Fi Director: Ridley Scott Starring: Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender, Charlize Theron
Description: A team of explorers out a clue about the origins of mankind on Earth, leading them on a journey into the darkest corners of the universe. There, they must fight a terrible battle to save the future of mankind. Review: So I took the long-awaited Prometheus tonight. Overall a good, but the characters are annoying and disturbing mass is so essential health and safety regulations regarding pollution, contamination, quarantine and exposure injuries carry sufficient safety equipment in a strange alien environment, etc. Maybe it's just supposed to be careless or stupid in about 80 years. Tsk! Also, while not a pro-God or a creationist as such, it has such a dump on Darwinism and the role of evolution in our existence.Being in 3D is pretty useless. I even got to make sure that the glasses. It was hard, but noticeable.Gorgeous sets and images, but I was not too happy about engineers or Space riders look at their bio-mechanical suits.It hindered thoroughly incredible and quite unprofessional characters. Stupid scientists and crew lacks professional integrity you expect from one billion U.S. dollars mission. Oh, and old Weyland old little horror. Only Guy Pearce with lamb prosthetic wrinkles. How about using a real old man actor with real old bones? He stuck out like a sore thumb. In any case, I owe to pick up, but its a very valuable lesson, and most people arent as picky as I have the desire guess.I theyd stop making movies like all the stupid 15 year old kids without any real intelligence, though. And it should be deliberately made to the 18 certificates (in the UK at least).
Year: 2006 Genre: Drama, Mystery, Thriller Director: Christopher Nolan Starring: Hugh Jackman, Christian Bale, Michael Caine
Description: The rivalry between two magicians is exacerbated when one of them made the final illusion. Review: What Prestige are very well re period in the history of show business near the end of the century, the competition was tough and tight black artists. Flying is a complex illusions are brought to life through the stunning finely detailed machine that replicates the actual mechanics of Victorian legerdemain. Great film rings very true, because the all-consuming obsession of the main character to be the best and outperform all others. Its an easy step to assume that such an unwavering determination spills over the territory of a deadly rival wizards suave Rupert Angier (Hugh Jackman riveting performance) and Alfred Borden bold (Christian Bale plays a grim effort lower-class Brit) Paragraph seeks revenge on each other.The ongoing story, though adapted the novel seems a perfect fit for the sensitivity of the Director of Nolans, such as the machinations of the two has become more difficult over back and forth tug remember to ask questions about your style Nolans memory. As the game grows increasingly deadly and threatens to consume everything that I love, the film becomes interesting to examine mindedness.The work is epic in clean, beautifully filmed and acted firmly. The only odd note is the casting David Bowie as Nikola Tesla (he has nothing to do with the actual Tesla, if you care about such things, and his appearance refers to himself as a superstar casting often does), but Mr. Mr. Bowie holds. Solid performances are everywhere, with Michael Caine added stature and depth as the old master, Scarlett Johansen as wonderful as assistant stage which becomes the third section twisted love triangle, and even Andy serkis (Gollum!) recalled , published in a supporting role. Tesla adds a twist introduced as a movie a real shift in the phase of illusion-can be steam-punkish sci-fi. This transition has been difficult to pull off a note of the beginning of the film does not quite show in this direction, but if you're willing to let Nolan takes you on a journey more fantastic areas, said the rewards you with a thought-provoking moral and a dramatic exploration of the issues raised. a really funny movie, and the original, unusual, dark ride - and well worth the Grand Theatre in scope and vision.
Year: 2006 Genre: Action, Fantasy, History Director: Zack Snyder Starring: Gerard Butler, Lena Headey, Dominic West
Description: King Leonidas and a force of 300 men fight the Persians at Thermopylae in 480 BC Review: This film is not for everyone. That is to say the number of films in general, of course, but mostly brings a great point melee among critics, what we see in our films? What is more important to portray fictional environment, because people mind blowing experience visual or entertain and amaze them with clever plot twists and intelligent dialogues? The first allows you to analyze exactly what this film is made. Basically it's all just an epic fight scene after another. Most notable is the camera work and visual effects. Every shot looks like it should be a work of art. Colors, characters, costumes, backgrounds ... Each detail is paid so much attention to childhood. During major battles, you will immediately notice the unique adaptations. There are many time slowdown during battles that show exactly what's happening. Fatal wounds that slowly leak blood spatter in the air, traveling decapitated head in slow motion across the screen ... its all. History, on the other hand it is not too difficult, in the sense that the whole film could be described in a sentence or two. Dialogues are simple and often talk about moral values, such as freedom and honor. If you look at the script, it would probably look like a movie that has a lot to offer, and ideas about how life should scold. reviewers of this title seems to be divided into two groups. They either love passionately calling it 21 century epic film or hate it even more and blow him up like a piece of garbage, mindless action and silly clichés? sentences. I'm willing to take in this argument. Normally, it is permissible to weigh both sides of this issue resulting fair process on the film. Is in this one. On the visual side are definitely some of the best witnessed in the film. Every detail, every background every special effects scenes are set to mindblowingly amazing. On the other hand, plot and dialogues are the most common and frankly stupid. I fight for freedom! Id rather die in honor then live in shame! Sounds familiar? Of course it can be argued that this film is not intended primarily to have a unique storyline that makes your head spin. But from an objective point of view is still lacking in this department, so it should be fine noted.Now this is so, but it all makes a movie? It's worth watching, or what? I think it is. For me, the good outweighs the bad by miles. On the second movie started it took me, and not let go. Every battle, every scene of the movie had me on top of my chair. Everything from playing strong visuals to amazing battle cry soldiers were so awesome ... It was really wonderful experience.It not a single moment feeling that the film lacking nothing. But I can not imagine why other people did.So heresy deal.If You Easily Impressed beautiful landscapes, stunning camera work and editing strong and active then go see. Fair. Now. You'll be missing if you do not. There is so much to see, so much power in this comic translated to the big screen ... I leave you awe.However, looking for a good story, clever twists, some innovative films Boten, which will then go through. 300 does not contain anything that does not want to give. I enjoyed the movie so much, but I know that they are people who will go into the trash, and that's understandable. Just be sure to keep your mind on what you want to see when you go to the theater itself, instead, warn tone bias reviews on this site offers.
13 
4
